|
●
|
Contracts were signed in July 2010 which should have been agreed by the Head of Finance - strangely that Head of Finance appears to have been against such a move - to lease around 18,000 square feet of office space at Belle Vue Mills at a cost of £170/sq.ft. The lease alone is over £3 million and there is no parking for staff. The floor area is around half of what was stated to be necessary, meaning that CDC will be sharing some space with North Yorkshire County Council for the next thirty years . Of course financial details on this shared area are also murky - will CDC have to pay for more in 30 years? CDC may well not even have a reception desk then unless yet more money is paid over, as that is part of the shared area paid for by NYCC - who have only taken a 30 year lease!
|
|
●
|
However, the former HML building in Skipton Town Centre has been up for sale for well over a year, and was always going to be available once their new building was constructed - on land which we had virtually given to them. That building is 41,000 square feet at the asking price of £61/sq.ft and around one third of the cost of Belle Vue Mills! Alternatively the HML building can be rented at a mere £8.50/sq.ft/annum. The property would comfortably accommodate both CDC and NYCC, moreover the purchase (offers around £2.5Million for the whole) or rental prices for the HML building are negotiable downward. Even at the asking price the HML option equates to a huge saving over the Belle Vue Mills deal.
|
|
●
|
So strapped for cash is CDC that in order to fund the leasing of Belle Vue Mills it is having to take £1.2Million from its pension fund*, a pension fund which at the last report was some £27million in deficit - around £100,000 per employee.
|
|
●
|
A local property valuation firm, Westlake & Co, was commissioned to give a ‘best value’ report on Belle Vue Mills, but the firm was instructed that they must only consider the options available on the Belle Vue site. Westlake was also told that that other site options had been considered, and rejected, by CDC. This ‘evaluation’ was carried out in 2008, when the property was owned by Novo homes.
|